Education
* The level of education of immigrants varies more than that of the native population. While 13 percent of the native population aged 25 or older has less than a high school education, 33 percent of immigrants lack a high school degree. However, this figure is only five percent for immigrants from Africa, and is less than 20 percent for immigrants from Asia, Europe and South America. At the other end of the educational spectrum, 30 percent of immigrants arriving after 1990 have at least a college degree, compared with 28 percent of the native population.
* Less than six percent of immigrants from Mexico, El Salvador and Guatemala have a college education and approximately 60 percent do not have a high school education. Immigrants from countries that have many refugees are also less likely to be college-educated and more likely to lack a high school education than the native population and legal immigrants from other countries.
* The language barrier between many immigrants and the native population inhibits the educational attainment of immigrants. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, between 1990 and 2000 the number of people who spoke a language other than English at home grew from 31.8 million to 44.6 million people. Immigrants currently constitute nearly half of those individuals. Of the immigrants who speak a language other than English at home, one-fifth speak English either "not well" or "not at all."
* The number of children of immigrants who do not speak English proficiently has grown at an even faster rate. The United States Department of Education reports that between 1990 and 2000 the number of students with limited English skills doubled to five million, which is four times the growth rate for the overall student population. The number of teachers capable of instructing these students has not expanded at a comparable rate.
Employment and Labor
* Immigrants constitute a disproportionately large percentage of the labor force. In 2000, they represented 12.8 percent of the nation’s total work force even though they comprised only 11.1 percent of the total population. This disparity occurs because a higher proportion of immigrants is of working age compared to the native population. The employment statistics of immigrants reflect their lower average level of educational attainment. In 2000, almost 30 percent of immigrants who worked full time did not have a high school diploma, and of those who arrived in the 1990s, 34 percent were dropouts. As a result, although immigrants comprised close to 13 percent of the workforce, they constituted 35 percent of high school dropouts in the workforce.
* Due to the low level of education of some immigrants it is not surprising that many are employed at jobs requiring little formal education. In 2000, immigrants made up 18 percent of those non- private household service jobs such as janitor, security guard, and child-care worker. They comprised only 10 percent of individuals in managerial or professional jobs. In terms of self-employment, one of every nine immigrants was self-employed in 2000, a level equal to that of the native population.
* There is a significant earnings disparity between immigrants and the native U.S. population. Nearly 17 percent of those who are foreign- born live below the poverty line, compared to 11 percent of the native population. The poverty rate for immigrants from Europe (9 percent) and Asia (13 percent), however, is close to the rate of the native population, and is much lower than for those from Latin America (22 percent). In 2000, 10 percent of the immigrant population households had household incomes above $75,000 per year, compared to 13 percent of the native population.
* The longer immigrants live in the U.S., the less probable it is that they will be poor. Recent immigrants are twice as likely to live in poverty, but those who entered before 1980 are less frequently in poverty than the native population.
Rural/Suburban Concentration of Immigrants
* Recently, many immigrants, especially Hispanics, have been migrating from rural to suburban areas. In 1990 immigrants were nearly equally divided between cities and suburban areas. Today, immigrants are more likely to live in suburban areas. According to the 2000 Census data, five percent of immigrants live in rural areas and 45 percent in central cities, while approximately half live in the suburbs.
* As immigrants bypass central cities to move to areas where greater employment opportunities exist, they accelerate a demographic trend away from major immigrant hubs, such as New York, toward areas with formerly small immigrant populations, such as North Carolina and Florida. The Hispanic population in many southern metropolitan areas has been multiplying. Between 1980 and 2000 the Hispanic population in Raleigh, North Carolina grew 1,180 percent. Similarly, the Hispanic population in Atlanta grew 995 percent, while Charlotte (962 percent) and Orlando (859 percent) have had comparably high growth rates. Although established Hispanic areas such as Los Angeles and New York have much larger Hispanic populations than these new rapidly growing areas, their growth rates have been much slower in recent years.
The influx of immigrants to both rural and suburban areas has directly impacted the other inhabitants of those regions. Recent data from the 2000 Census indicate that as recent immigrants arrive from places like Central America and China, native-born residents and more established immigrants are moving out. (This assessment was based on preliminary income data, broken down only by county.) Looking at the economic boom of the late 1990s, most experts expected the benefits from the economic surge to be dispersed evenly throughout all counties. However, this was not the case. In regions with large immigrant populations, such as New York and parts of Southern California, the majority of the counties with small immigrant populations reported significant gains in the median income. Conversely, the counties with high percentages of immigrants reported negligible gains or significant decreases in the median income. Experts hypothesize that this gulf in the rate of change results from the replacement of longtime residents in immigrant neighborhoods by new waves of recent immigrants with lower levels of education.
This Executive Summary was prepared in August of 2002 by Stephen Sahlman, research assistant at the Population Research Center. Sources include the 2000 INS Statistical Yearbook, Immigration in the United States-2000: A Snapshot of America's Foreign Born Population by Steven A. Camarota (Center for Immigration Studies, January 2001), The Foreign-Born Population in the United States: Population Characteristics by Lisa Lollock (US Census Bureau, January 2001), "Census Finds Immigrants Lower City's Income Data," by Janny Scott (The New York Times, August 6, 2002), "Area Latino Population Among Tops In Growth," by D'Vera Cohn (The Washington Post, July 28, 2002), and "Wave of Pupils Lacking English Strains Schools," by Yilu Zhao (The New York Times, August 5, 2002). For more information, contact the Center at (202) 467-5030, 1725 K Street, NW, Suite 1102, Washington, DC 20006 or (609) 452-2822, 15 Roszel Road, Princeton, NJ 08540.
Please send feedback to prc@prcnj.org.
Labels: articles